Has anime gone too mainstream?

Anime

Last night, John and I finished rewatching the Gundam Zeta compilation movies. While the 50-episode show originally aired in 1985, at least half of that original footage was digitally reanimated in 2005 for the movies.

The result is unintentionally hilarious. Each scene’s animation style slides forward or backward 20 years, seemingly at random. One moment, faces and machines look smooth and polished, the next they’re scribbley and hand drawn.

For example, here’s protagonist Kamille originally drawn in 1985:

And here he is digitally reanimated in the same scene.

While we can credit some of this animation improvement to modern technology, a lot of it has to do with the fact that, in 2005, the Gundam franchise saw more value in spending time and money on animation than it did 20 years before. I think we can agree that the above capture was never on the cutting edge of animation, even at its time.

After all, it didn’t make economic sense to put big productions on Gundam Zeta. The creators were already taking a big risk with the show. Nobody expected Gundam Zeta — or any show like it — to be as big a hit as it was.

Since its inception, anime has changed a lot. It’s certainly gotten easier on the eyes. As it’s gotten picked up in America, it’s also gotten easier on my wallet. And even when I don’t purchase anime, I can watch it on Netflix or cable. Because whether we admit it or not, anime is mainstream now.

Let’s take a look at another show I’ve been watching lately, Tiger and Bunny.

In terms of animation style, this show is as advanced as you can get. No more of the low level production values of Zeta in the 80’s — today’s anime is no gamble; it’s good business. That goes especially for Tiger and Bunny, where you’ll be viewing advertisements whether you’re watching the show on Hulu or not.

In Tiger and Bunny, corporations sponsor heroes, like namesakes Tiger and Bunny, to fight crime. Heroes are highly evolved humans with special powers (more like X-Men than Newtype) who beat up bad guys while brandishing advertisements all over their suits. But while heroes are made up, these ads are for real companies. Bunny, for one, shills for both Amazon.co.jp and Bandai whenever he dons armor.


It doesn’t matter whether you think this is a clever product placement or a total sell-out. It’s still a complete game changer in the anime world, where companies once preferred to invent fake brands like Somy than step on any corporate toes. Until recently, anime wouldn’t have been able to give the big guns anything on their return investment. But clearly, that’s all changed.

At Otakon, I attended Anime News Network’s panel on anime journalism. One of the panelists said, “Anime has always been cheap and weird. But that’s part of why we like it.” But now that anime is lucrative and conventional, will the longtime fans stick with it?

I think we will. If you’re anything like me, you’ve been spoiled by today’s convenience. I certainly don’t miss swapping VHS tapes with my friends. And while it was fun in middle school to create my own Gundam Wing school supplies with a color printer and lots of glue, today I prefer having the option to buy official merchandise.

If you’re nostalgic for the anime of the past, try watching Gundam Zeta without the digitally remastered scenes. When you get over its vintage novelty, you too will develop an appreciation for how far anime has come.


P.S. You can still vote for my SXSW panel submission: Trekkies, geeks and furries oh my! Covering fandom. I’d really appreciate it!

What to do when you think your fandom is misunderstood

Fandom

On the Saturday of Otakon, an old man stopped John and I. He asked us for cash. He had just had dental surgery, you see, and needed cab fare. We would’ve been moved, but this same guy had stopped us with the same scam last Otakon.

I wasn’t about to forget him because I’m not too good at scams. Last year, we didn’t have any money so we vowed to wait with him and make sure he was okay. For some reason, he didn’t seem to want us to stay, and he wouldn’t let us call the police for help.

I’m sure that old man will be at Otakon year after year, because attendees are really compassionate people. At Otakon 2011, we collected $65,000 to donate to the Japan Relief Fund. Otakon was also recently named Customer of the Year by Visit Baltimore for being an all around great addition to the city. And if you want to really know about the kind things Otakon attendees have done, check out the comment thread on the Washington Post article I wrote about last week. The negative slant of the article has compelled commenters to recount random acts of Otakon kindness.

However, sometimes it’s tough for me to be nice because I worry it makes our fandom an easy target. There’s that perennial scammer, for one. But what really made me mad was watching this:

Do you feel transported back to high school? Just look at the popular girl picking on the nerd. Except these two are grown-ups, and the news station is framing it as if it is a relevant topic: nerds are having a grand old time and leaving everyone else in America to resolve the debt ceiling debate. We all know the two events aren’t at all dichotomous.

It’s stuff like this that makes me wish fandom was understood.

If you follow me on Twitter, you know I tried to feed the trolls on Sunday of the convention. I was wondering if Baltimoreans knew we could see any tweet with the Otakon hashtag. I only got one response from an outsider, but several of my followers chastised me for getting mad. That’s just not how we behave. We aren’t supposed to ask outsiders to understand us. We’re expected to turn the other cheek.

After my poorly judged tweets, an observant Baltimorean wrote me an email:

“Have you heard the saying, ‘Never try to teach a pig to sing…?’ If you have you might not have heard the rest, ‘It wastes your time and annoys the pig.’”

The fact that hardly anyone responded to my tweets, even after I instigated an argument, shows that those outsiders didn’t actually want to understand. Outsiders view Otakon as they would a passing car crash, morbidly interesting for a mere moment.

If I want people to understand what I do, then as a professional fandom reporter, I’m in the wrong line of work. There are always going to be people who misunderstand fandom and take it out on me. But if I start to bite back, I’ll just get a reputation for being weird AND mean. If they want to find out more, they’ll look it up. They don’t need me tweeting my opinions at them like a Jehovah’s Witness pounding at the door.

Our best defense is to keep having a fantastic time with our hobbies and ignoring the naysayers. If you must say something, talk about how great the fandom is, like many of the commenters on the Post article. Stories about kindness help us. Lashing out just tires us out and wastes our time.

There are a lot of points of views on fandom out there. Our chance of ours being understood lies in our acceptance of everyone else’s.

On being a fan and a journalist, part II

Journalism

(Continued from part I)

There’s something infectious about being a nerd at a convention. Being around all these other nerds with their bold costumes and boisterous personalities, I just can’t be in a bad mood. Even though I was about to meet with the Washington Post reporter and I was nervous.

We had exchanged emails a couple of times just before Otakon. Since I was following him on Twitter now, I saw when he requested a press pass from the convention, and I saw when they replied and granted him one. I emailed him and asked him if he wanted to meet. He replied that he’d love to connect. And then, as an afterthought, he added:

the hall could smell interesting tomorrow, with the heat and humidity, eh? (people keep telling me that cosplayers can be a “ripe” bunch. some of them, anyway.)

Those two sentences stuck in my head. He didn’t have to add them. It just let me know what sort of knowledge he was going into this with. It reminded me of my talk last year with another Washington Post reporter, Dan Zak.

When I was featured on Jezebel, I said I wanted to write about the Katsucon maid cafe because I didn’t like Mr. Zak’s portrayal. Amazingly, kindly, Zak sent me an email along the lines of, “You wanted to talk? Let’s talk.” I said that he was biased toward the source material. He said, “…this is not the judgment or opinion of an outsider. It is observed fact.”

I’ve only recently understood his answer. That was, of course, the truth. Anime fandom looks very, very different to outsiders than it does to me.

This is why, when people ask me if I’m biased, I tell them my passion makes me a better reporter. I don’t think the best reporting comes from distancing yourself from your subject and steering clear of anything that might interest you in the slightest. It helps to have knowledge about the communities you are writing about, and it helps to have connections in the field. I can’t imagine, for example, that a crimes and courts reporter who isn’t close with the Chief of Police is able to write very accurate stories.

But I have to be careful about my audience. I have to worry about coming off as being “in too deep.” That’s why reporters like Dan Zak and J. Freedom duLac have much more sway over my preferred beat. Outside of the fandom, that is. And that’s why I care so much about meeting up with Mr. duLac at Otakon and offering my perspective to him.


Thanks to Twitter profile photos, we recognize each other instantly, shake hands, make small talk. I hardly remember what was actually said, but I remember just how it went. duLac is an excellent reporter, quiet and observant. I liked him immediately. I think it was because he let me talk so much.

He’d ask a small question like, “What are these girls wearing doll dresses and petticoats for?” and I’d explain that it’s Lolita street fashion from Harajuku, not actually from an anime. We were standing in front of the line for the Madoka Magica premiere, so there were lots of people to look at. He’d ask which costume meant what, and I didn’t always know.

“I don’t think anyone at this entire convention could accurately recognize every single costume here,” I said.

Out of the corner of my eye, I saw a man dressed as Char. I asked to excuse myself because I wanted to take a picture.

“Otakon is a little like Disneyland,” I said to duLac. “You can call people by their character names and they’ll respond so you can take their photo.”

duLac watched as I asked Char for his photo and set up my camera. “I love your costume, Char,” I said. “I’m working on cosplaying as female Char this fall.”

“Then we’ll have to meet up,” he replied. “And we’ll–” He made a lewd gesture with his fingers.

It was so uncalled for and I was so embarrassed I just said something like, “I don’t think so,” and returned to duLac, cheeks burning, mumbling about Disneyland some more.

He changed the subject.

“I asked a man in line over there what he thought the mainstream media gets wrong about fans. He said ‘That we all live with our parents still.’ So I asked him,” duLac continued, “‘Do you live with you parents?’ and the guy started stammering, ‘Not exactly, I pay rent and stuff.’”

I nodded. Was I visibly cringing?

“And I just thought, ‘If that was going to be the answer, why didn’t he LIE to me?’”

Yeah, I thought, why hadn’t he?


Today when the article came out, I read it over and wrote to duLac right away:

Josh, I just read your story. I was prepared to hate it, but I don’t. It’s an important part of convention culture that I would have never felt comfortable writing about. And you got the facts right, too.

He replied:

Thanks tons for the note. I really wasn’t sure what you’d think once I decided to go in that direction, since I know it’s a really sensitive subject — and you never know if you get something like this right.

He shouldn’t have been worried. I knew from the beginning which direction this story was going to go in. That’s why I don’t know if it was a brave angle or not. On the one hand, his comment section is already full of angry notes, making him look like this was a daring and dissented take. On the other hand, it’s exactly the kind of opinion non-fans already have of the fan community.

duLac’s story does make anime conventions look seedy. But there’s nothing untrue about his observations. And so, it needed to be said. When it’s over, our fandom will be stronger for it.

Even this biased journalist has to admit that.

On being a fan and a journalist, part I

Journalism

If you’re reading this post, one of two things has happened: the Washington Post has scrapped a story about American anime fans and stigma or that story was published today.

I’m writing from the perspective of July 15, exactly ten minutes after getting off the phone with the Post reporter, J. Freedom duLac. When he emailed me to ask if he could call me about the post I had just written on my blog, Should anime conventions screen for sex offenders?, my hands shook while I wrote my affirmative reply. Carefully, agonizingly, I drafted a three paragraph statement that I would parrot out to him on the phone, basically a summary of my article.

However, when duLac called the next day, that wasn’t exactly what he had in mind. He was interested in anime fan stigmas. Nevermind this one incident of sexual assault. Is our community clouded by this unsavory misrepresentation in general, he wanted to know.

I explained Lolicon and Hentai. We discussed the demographic of fans, how it’s always getting younger. We talked about the upcoming Otakon.

“Of course,” I said, “If it turns out the sex offender didn’t like lolicon anime, then this is an isolated assault incident like any other.” I reminded the reporter that the instance itself didn’t happen at the convention, where there are hundreds of staff and Security personnel.

duLac asked if this incident really was isolated, or if local anime conventions are battling a problem with sexual assault. I let him know that this was the only one I’d heard of, and it didn’t even happen at an anime convention.

I steered the conversation to Katsucon’s policy. That it’s a reactive policy that treats future attendees like potential criminals. I mentioned how in the ANN forum post for the article, one commenter wrote,

“Leave it to the sickos to make the rest of us older guys that go to cons feel like eyeballs will be watching us double now. I already have issues with going to cons and being the odd man out, and this guy has to make it just that much harder. We as a fandom don’t need the stigma of jerks like this making us look like pedophiles and creepy rapists.”

duLac thought he might be able to build a story around that one comment. He said he’d do some research and let me know.

I wanted to keep talking about the case, how it was isolated. That’s when I had a flashback to my reporting days at the local paper in Fredericksburg, VA. I’d be on the phone with a source, trying to find out all the facts about the restaurant opening. And all the restaurant opener wanted to do was ensure that I was going to make her restaurant look good.

I have an agenda. I don’t want him to think anime fans are bad people. This isn’t one journalist talking to another. I’m in too deep here to be a journalist.

This should be a turning point for me. The moment I realize I’m too involved in the fandom community to report on it without my love pouring out. Instead, this is the moment I realized that nobody is completely objective.

In J-school, one professor suggested that if we wanted to be true journalists, we would stop voting in elections. We would take our voting cards and register as Independents, just in case somebody found them. In order to pretend we don’t have preferences, we should give up one of our rights as citizens.

After duLac and I hung up the phone, I sent him an email with a list of links. I included all the most recent string of anime porn related arrests. I sent him a Katsucon PR contact. When I thought I’d given him enough information to write an objective story, I sent it.

I’m compromised. I’m biased. I’m in too deep. But I’m committed to getting the awful truth out, if there really is one. If it turns out there’s no connection, he’ll see that. I know the fandom won’t let me down.

I spoke again with duLac at Otakon and gave this topic some more reflection. Read about it in Part II.

How a civil war reenactment is like an anime convention

Fandom

1. Costumes

I admired the women the most. Whether from discipline or dedication to their historical characters, they didn’t seem to mind the heat. Though it was 100 degrees with high humidity, they were calmly perched on folding stools, knitting or lightly fanning themselves while wearing full, ankle length dresses.

I knew the heavy cotton of their gowns was just the beginning of the uniform. Underneath were layers of white linen: hoop skirt and pantaloons and bloomers and corsets, not to mention knee length striped stockings and boots. One woman had stripped to her corset and full body chemise. Somehow, she looked more nude than all of us visitors wearing tank tops.

I knew this much about their clothing since I was a reenactor myself. In college, I got the opportunity to camp with the 3rd US Infantry, a union troop. I wore an ill-fitting borrowed camp dress (preserved in a photo so unflattering I won’t post it and you’ll have to visit this link instead) with what felt like two extra outfits underneath to the Battle of New Market reenactment. It was late spring and comfortable. I can only imagine what kind of discipline you’d need in this heat.

Though I sympathized with the women, the men weren’t much better off. Since the Battle of Manassas was the first battle of the war, it was accurate for everyone to be in full uniform, up to the thick, woolen army jackets.

2. Dedication to canon

Accuracy is the first tenet of Civil War reenacting. I remember sitting around the fire with the 3rd US while some of the reenactors poked fun at Renaissance Fair revelers.

“Look at me in my fairy wings, I look like I’m from the Middle Ages,” one soldier mocked. (It’s also interesting to note that the Renaissance Fair diehards I’ve spoken to don’t think much of Civil War reenactors either — they’re “no fun.”)

Reenactors are sticklers for detail. Even in the heat, very few altered their outfits.

“What a pretty dress ruined by those flip flops,” a colonel on his horse called to a woman walking beside him, bonnet on and basket in hand. “And are your nails that pink naturally?” he continued to the first woman’s companion, joking about her anachronistic nailpolish.

After the first day of the reenactment, during which several soldiers were treated for heat exhaustion, a few liberties were taken. Women in camp dresses carried ice cubes and water to the troops. Fallen soldiers came back to life and crawled off the battlefield to cool down in the shade. One corporal poured water into his hat for his horse to drink noisily out of. Actually, that may have been an accurate detail.

3. Acceptance

The battle endured for three hours, after which the Confederate troops prevailed, just like they had 150 years ago. There were cheers in the stands whenever Stonewall Jackson or Robert E. Lee, both present, rode by. White parents bought their children Confederate uniform caps as souvenirs.

I made a point to stop and interview any black female reenactors I saw. I hadn’t seen any at the Battle of New Market. First I met Elizabeth Keckley, a White House slave. Actually, this was a professional reenactor named Lillian Garland who felt a strong dedication to her character. In fact, she’d found 32 similarities between them, from their mixed race status to even their husbands’ names. Lillian’s husband was fighting on the Union side as we talked. Here she is with her freedom papers.

Next I spoke with an Ohio school teacher (in actuality, an Ohio paralegal), whose trip to petition in Washington had been delayed by the battle. She’s the woman on the right in the second photo of this post. She said she’d been reenacting since 1980 when she had joined a sizeable community of black reenactors and history buffs.

“But now, I’m getting old and the kids just aren’t interested,” she said.

We talked about the fact that most reenactors prefer to fight for the South. I suggested that maybe they’re hoping to win this time.

“That’s a good one,” she said, gasping from either laughter or heat. “Maybe they’ll win this time.”

However, she didn’t know any black reenactors for the Confederacy.

I was not so strong as the school teacher, so I made my way to a cooling tent, shaded with a big air conditioning unit inside. On the way, I met Miss Confederacy.

Miss Confederacy is from Kentucky. She’s in college studying to be a nurse. She said she’d love to major in history, but she doesn’t know what she’d do for a living. Her mother sewed the dress she’s wearing.

I asked her if she had friends on the “wrong side” of the war, as Confederate reenactors sometimes call it. She looked nervous, like she knew what I really wanted to ask.

“Once at the beginning of the reenactment, I came over to visit them at their camp. They joked that they should keep me there and let the rebels know they were holding Miss Confederacy for ransom,” she said, smiling.

As with the school teacher, I was too hot to even take out my notepad and get down her name. A Google Search for “Miss Confederacy” brings up articles about Jefferson Davis and the KKK and not much about pageants.

4. Outsider appeal

By this point I knew something was wrong with me. My vision was blurred and so were the photos I was taking. I felt drunk and everything sounded funny. I’d soon realize I was just very dehydrated. Luckily, I was not one of the many people who got heat stroke. A steady stream of ambulances drove over the battlegrounds to aid the unlucky ones.

I stumbled into line at a concession stand to get a lemonade. Standing in front of me was a man with a wet towel around his neck, listening to a tape recorder. I knew he was a reporter.

“How is your story going?” I asked.

“Not sure where it’s going yet,” he replied.

He was with the New York Post. I told him I was with nobody, but I am a journalist too so I like to ask questions. I told him about how I wanted to talk to black female reenactors.

“For me, talking to people is the worst part,” he said. I imagined his stories to be full of scenery and observation. I told him I used to be a reenactor, and I found it much easier to ask questions when I was wearing the same clothes as the people I wanted to talk to.

“Have you noticed that the TV reporters here are only looking at the most beautiful and weirdest people they can find?” he said. “I saw the Channel 7 guy interview the most gorgeous southern belle followed by the most scraggly bearded soldier.”

I thought about how TV media covered Comic-Con, focusing on the most scantily clad cosplayers and the most greasy comic collectors.

“Yeah,” I said. “What are people going to think?”