Otaku Links: Fandom as religion, fandom as love

Otaku Links

startrek_hotel

  • You could stay in this high tech Star Trek hotel room in Sao Paulo for $670 a night. They went all out on this!
  • On Beneath The Tangles, Charles has been paralleling Genshiken’s motleysense of community with that of a parish. I’m not religious, but Charles’ Christian anime blog is one of my weekly reads.
  • Is it Anime Christmas or something? Psycho Pass was confirmed for a second season.
  • Anybody know where I can watch Heroes of Cosplay on SyFy even if I don’t have cable? Of course I’ll be watching it for Yaya Han’s amazing costumes.

On liking shallow anime

Fandom

free

Over here in anime fandom, we’re fond of reminding outsiders that anime is “more than cartoons.”

Sure, it was a little more difficult to discern that back in the days that Blockbuster grouped anime for kids, anime for teens, and sometimes even hentai together all in the same ANIME category. But today, it’s generally accepted that there are varied shows for every audience, whether you’re into science fiction or you’re five years old.

And some anime can be really deep. People write actual theses on what happened in Evangelion. It’s easy to see why an anime that tackles theology is “more than cartoons.”

However, confession time. Like many of my readers who happen to be attracted to man abs, I am really into Free! right now. I can’t wait until later today when I get to see Anime Ryan Gosling, Shota, and the rest splash and frolic in the water.

It might be premature to say this, but I don’t think anyone’s going to write a book on the symbolism and sociological insights in Free! It’s just manservice.

From Lucky Star to K-On, anime without depth is nothing new. Within the anime community, we all admit we watch it and love it. But outside our group, it kind of puts us on the defensive. “That’s not what ALL anime is like!”

I got the idea to write a post about liking “bad” or “flawed” anime from Anime Yume, and she in turn got the idea to write about it from Froggykun. It’s a popular topic because we all feel a little bad. After all the progress we’ve made highlighting the creative and intellectual gems to come out of anime, it feels like a betrayal to indulge in anything else.

From a big picture perspective, shallow anime doesn’t negate the whole genre. I mean, just because the Western world is responsible for the likes of Here Comes Honey Boo Boo doesn’t eclipse modern classics like Donnie Darko. And while that argument seems obvious now that I’ve written it down, it feels a little less defensible when I’m trying to promote a fandom that outsiders already know I’m really passionate about.

What is your favorite “bad” anime and do you ever feel guilty for enjoying it?

Why fandom isn’t forever

Fandom

free_swimming_anime

Last week, I started watching Attack On Titan about 13 weeks after everybody else got into it. Finally, all the memes on my Tumblr dashboard started to make sense!

Things were crystal clear for a hot second, up until Free! began airing last week. Overnight, posts about Titans were replaced by posts about swimming. It’s the circle of fandom, the rise and fall of our obsessions within obsessions.

Attack on Titan and Free! both just happen to have large female fan bases, making the switch that much more sudden and apparent. But usually, we’re only marginally aware of the drift of fandom. A feeling in the back of our minds like, “Weren’t bronies a big deal in just a few months ago?” or “Has it really been a year since I last played Skyrim?”

tumblr

What makes fandom drift interesting to me is that it mimics newsgathering. Some scholars describe our news cycle as a spotlight, highlighting one thing for a brief time before moving onto the next. It’s why you’re not still hearing updates about victims of the Boston bombings. It’s why the front page changes overnight, or every hour online.

The thing about identifying as a geek, nerd, or otaku is that we tend to have a lot of interests under the same umbrella. We’re always looking for the Next New Thing, then the thing after that, and then nostalgia for the first thing, making it new again.

What’s more unusual is sticking with one fandom for long past its air date. It tickles me how my friend and colleague, Aja Romano, is still participating in a fandom for two side characters in Inception, a movie that is now three years old. My husband, too, prefers to keep his fandom in the 20th century, re-watching Patlabor and Star Wars. It took a lot of convincing to get him to try Attack on Titan.

But refusing to keep up with fandom drift results in more social consequences than failing to keep up with the news. If you can tell me about the unrest that’s going on in Egypt right now, you’re in the informed minority. But if you don’t want to know that Snape kills Dumbledore (and I’m keeping my example dated on purpose), you can’t even sign on to Twitter or Tumblr without being spoiled. Plus, as XKCD once pointed out, by the time you do catch on, your friends will find you infuriating.

When you join a fandom, you become part of an obsessive, intimate—and temporary—community. If you get in at the onset, you’re getting the best possible fandom experience. You get to talk with big name fans before they become special guests at conventions, participate in the creation of the fandom’s first memes and fan works, and enjoy being on the inside just as everyone else is starting to catch on.

But if you get into it late, like I did with Attack on Titan, you’ll just be browsing a digital ghost town that’s left behind in a swimming anime’s wake.

Otaku Links: This time, it’s personal

Otaku Links

Every week, I post articles (and many other types of links) from around the Internet, while rarely acknowledging that I contribute plenty myself. So this Friday I’m indulging in a little self promotion while giving you a glimpse into my “day job.”

In 2013, I’ve written 45 articles for six outlets. Here are a few of the topics I’ve tackled this year:

Robots

robot

If you’d asked me a few months ago, I would have never expected to ever be on the robotics beat, or to like it so much. From making pancakes to saving human lives to teaching kids to code, there’s no limit to robotics engineers’ ingenuity.

Ladies in business and tech

keyboard_nails

For ReadWrite and The Women’s Book, women’s success stories are universally a big deal. While covering woman entrepreneurs and developers alike, I even got to interview a personal hero of mine, Jen Dziura.

Geekery and games

cupcakes

At this point in my career, my nerdy reputation precedes me. I get assigned geek topics about as often as I ask to write them, and that’s awesome.

(Photos via John Williams, lovemaegen, and Sugar Daze.)

A definition of ethics in fandom journalism

Journalism

Hey, remember the Bookstore? Getting married slowed me down, but I’m back to work on my latest guide, Navigating Ethics and Bias. I think this is my most important guide yet. From “ethics and bias for the human journalist” to my own personal ethical run-ins, it touches on a lot of things journalists don’t always talk about, but should.

Here’s a preview of the section titled, “A definition of ethics in fandom journalism.”


Scenario A: It’s always been your dream to visit Rockstar Games and report on it. So when the company invites you in your capacity as a journalist to tour the studio and conduct interviews, you’re over the moon! Everything is going great but at the end, your guide offers you their latest video game as a parting gift. It’s a review copy that isn’t even out in stores yet! Do you take it?

Scenario B: You received a press pass to attend and cover Dragon*Con. Your readers are all big fans of the convention and you want to write something about it they’ll enjoy. But during your research, you discover one of the founders has been charged with multiple counts of child molestation. Do you leave it out, or risk alienating your readers by writing about it?

Scenario C: An anonymous source reaches out to you with a tell-all about their time working for a comic book studio. Apparently she faced corruption, sexism, racism, everything. The source gives you proof and their story does seem to check out, but said, “If you publish this proof or my personal information, I’ll deny everything I told you.” Do you publish the proof or not?

Do you take gifts or other compensation from reporting subjects? Do you burn your readers, or burn your sources? None of these scenarios have clear-cut answers, and neither do most of the situations you’ll run into in your time practicing journalism.

When we talk about journalism ethics, what we’re really talking about is a series of guidelines we can try to apply to different real life cases. When you’re faced with a tough decision, it’s best to adhere more closely to the guidelines.

Here’s a summed-up version of the Society of Professional Journalists’ code of ethics:

  • Seek the truth and report it. Make sure you have sources and facts to back up your story. Don’t sensationalize or minimize impact. Never plagiarize.

  • Minimize harm. Be sensitive when interviewing people affected by tragedy. Remember citizens are innocent until proven guilty. Avoid identifying sex crime victims.

  • Act independently. Avoid conflicts of interest. Refuse gifts if they compromise your journalistic integrity. Never buy a story from a source.

  • Be accountable. Admit your mistakes and correct them. Encourage readers to discuss your coverage. Expose other media outlets acting unethically.

You can already see where these fit in:

In Scenario A, you should only accept the game review copy if you intend to review it and write about it for a publication. You shouldn’t take it as a favor or an incentive to write a positive story.

In Scenario B, you shouldn’t minimize the fact that Dragon*Con was founded by a charged molester, a truth that has led to boycotts, even if your audience balks. Sometimes having a duty to your audience means telling them the truth even when they don’t want to hear it.

In Scenario C, you should think about whether exposing your source could put her in danger. If not, could she have another, less savory motive for wanting to remain anonymous? You have an obligation to tell your readers the truth, but not by trampling over your sources’ privacy.


Want to read more? Join my mailing list and you’ll know the very minute this guide is out. I release my guides there several days before announcing them on the blog.